当前位置:首页 > 研究领域 > 制度竞争大棋局
研究领域
普通法及其法律的制定
2011年07月05日 【作者】庞德,R. 预览:

【作者】庞德,R.

【内容提要】

Not the least notable characteristics of American law today are the excessive output of legislation in all our jurisdictions and the indifference, if not contempt, with which that output is regarded by courts and lawyers. Text-writers who scrupulously gather up from every remote corner the most obsolete decisions and cite all of them, seldom cite any statutes except those landmarks which have become a part of our American common law, or, if they do refer to legislation, do so through the judicial decisions which apply it. The courts, likewise, incline to ignore important legislation; not merely deciding it to be declaratory, but sometimes assuming silently that it is declaratory without adducing any reasons, citing prior judicial decisions and making no mention of the statute.In the same way, lawyers in the legislature often  conceive it more expedient to make of a statute the barest outline, leaving details of the most vital importance to be filled in by judicial law-making. It is fashionable to point out the deficiencies of legislation and to declare that there are things that legislators cannot do try how they will.It is fashionable to preach the superiority of judge-made law.It may be well, however, for judges and lawyers to remember that there is coming to be a science of legislation and that modern statutes are not to be disposed of lightly as off-hand products of a crude desire to do something, but represent long and patient study by experts, careful consideration by conferences or congresses or associations, press discussions in which public opinion is focussed upon all important details, and hearings before legislative committees. 

【关键词】Common law; Legislation; Judicial decisions