Location : Home > Publications > AsianJLS
AsianJLS
Taisu ZAHNG | Preface to the Volume “Comparative Legal History in the Asian Context” and Overview of This Issue's Contents.
2025-03-29 [author] CISLS preview:

[author]CISLS

[content]

Preface to the Volume “Comparative Legal History in the Asian Context” and Overview of This Issue's Contents.

Asian Journal of Law and Society Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024)



Preface to the Volume: "Comparative Legal History in the Asian Context"

Taisu ZAHNG

Professor at Yale Law School, editorial board member of the Asian Journal of Law and Society, and guest editor of this volume.

Legal history research has always faced a dilemma of identity. As an interdisciplinary field that bridges legal studies and historical research, it naturally integrates the characteristics of both domains: it inherits the archival investigation and source analysis traditions of history while also adopting the analytical approach of law that centers on legal functions and meanings. What further complicates the issue is that, over the past few decades, the dominant trend in legal history research has clearly shifted toward interdisciplinary engagement with the social sciences. The theories and methods from sociology, political science, economics, and critical theory have played significant roles in shaping the framework of historical research conducted by legal scholars. As a result, legal history has become one of the most interdisciplinary areas within historical research—a nexus where multiple knowledge traditions overlap and interact. On one hand, this interdisciplinary nature is intellectually stimulating and rich in content; on the other, it makes it difficult for legal history to clearly define its core paradigms and disciplinary boundaries. Of course, what binds this field together is a shared concern for law and legal institutions, yet beyond that, it still exhibits a perplexing multidimensionality.

At the same time, comparative analysis across time and space has emerged as an important theme in legal history research over recent decades. This trend is partly due to the relatively normative character of law and its institutional forms. The core concept that “law is the formal rule promulgated by the state” endows law with a degree of commonality even in vastly different historical contexts. Although the Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire share little in common on the social or political level, their laws exhibit certain similarities in both function and form, making the comparative study of Han legal codes and Roman law intuitively accessible. Excellent comparative analysis generally requires that the subjects of comparison possess sufficient commonalities so that their differences become analytically meaningful. The relatively standardized form of law inherently provides such common ground—perhaps even more effectively than many other core concepts in socio-political analysis, such as state, society, economy, or religion.

The collection of papers in this legal history volume fully embodies these characteristics. On one hand, these papers delve deeply into issues, methodologies, and intellectual frameworks rooted in historical materials—extending far beyond their immediate cognitive boundaries. When these papers attempt to define the connotations of legal knowledge, understand the socio-political functions of freedom of speech, or engage in comparative reflection on supervisory and inspection functions, they are compelled to adopt conceptual frameworks and theoretical models borrowed from external disciplines and graft them onto historical materials. This notable connection with external theories distinguishes nearly all of these articles from those published in most purely historical journals, even though the external theories they invoke differ markedly from one another.

On the other hand, most of the papers in this volume also display prominent characteristics of comparative research—whether by comparing judicial jurisdiction systems in different regions or by undertaking diachronic comparisons within the same judicial system. In both cases, researchers must use the similarities of law and legal institutions across all comparative groups as the anchor for comparison. In some instances, this similarity is formal, stemming from the continuity of law’s form over time, even if its socio-political function has changed. In other cases, particularly in cross-regional comparisons, the similarity is inherently functional and serves as the basis for comparing and contrasting other functional attributes.

Consequently, this volume largely captures the methodological diversity and breadth of comparative research inherent to the field of legal history. This design is intentional: as co-editors of this volume, Chen Li and the undersigned sought to present a slice of legal history research centered on China or East Asia, thereby reflecting the broader characteristics of the field. The question then becomes whether these papers can still “coalesce into a whole” in an intellectual sense—enabling readers to gain more from the volume as an integrated collection than they would from reading each paper individually.

We believe the answer is affirmative. What binds these papers together is not merely their shared interest in East Asia (or China) or their common concern for law. In particular, the latter has forged analytical connections among the articles that the authors may not have originally anticipated. For instance, any study of judicial practice or the legal profession inevitably relies on certain assumptions about the state’s general role in local affairs, assumptions which in turn depend on how the state monitors and regulates local actors. Without simultaneously presupposing a particular model of political expression and judicial enforcement, research on freedom of speech or public health law would be difficult to sustain. Likewise, studies on political customs and social norms related to law must also explore the expressive function of law and how it is received by society. The interrelated nature of these issues does not differ greatly across time and space: they all revolve, in an abstract yet shared manner, around the core institutions of the state—even if the state’s form and function may differ fundamentally, as exemplified by the Roman Empire and China’s Qing Dynasty.

In fact, it is precisely the significant substantive differences in research themes presented in this volume that truly highlight the unavoidable analytical links. These links bind the papers together tightly and thereby define legal history as a distinct research field. A thematic study spanning approximately two thousand years and crossing judicial jurisdictions on three continents still manages, almost coincidentally, to touch upon interrelated issues such as state expression, institutional function, principal-agent problems, and social acceptance.

All of this perhaps suggests that, on an analytical level, “law” is a concept far weightier than “the formal rules promulgated by the state.” In other words, the concept of “the formal rules promulgated by the state” is itself sufficiently weighty and complex in its function to constitute an independent realm of cognition, even though the direct tools scholars use to study it already encompass the entire gamut of the social sciences. Therefore, legal history research must necessarily be both a study of law and a study of history, inheriting all the analytical characteristics and rich connotations of legal studies. Simply regarding it as a subfield of history is inadequate. On the contrary, much like legal studies in the broad sense, legal history belongs to that “connecting domain” which, by its very nature, rejects disciplinary purity.

《亚洲法与社会杂志》2024年第3期内容摘要

01 研究论文

1. In Response to Constitutional Crisis: The Latent Carl Schmitt in Zhang Junmai’s Political Thought

Dandan Chen

Abstract: This paper examines two responses to the global constitutional crises in the twentieth century, with a focus on a comparison between Carl Schmitt, a notorious German political theorist and critic of liberal constitutionalism and Zhang Junmai, a constitutionalist in Republican China. After the First World War, both Germany and China experienced constitutional crises, which prompted critical reflections among intellectuals. My paper is the first to discover and examine the latent element of Carl Schmitt in Zhang Junmai’s acceptance of the Weimar Constitution. My research shows that Zhang’s 1930 article, “Hugo Preuss (Author of the New German Constitution), His Concept of the State and His Position in the History of German Political Theory” (德國新憲起草者柏呂斯之國家觀念及其在德國政治學說史上之地位) is his Chinese translation of Carl Schmitt’s 1930 article, “Hugo Preuss: His Concept of the State and His Position in German State Theory” (“Hugo Preuss: Sein Staatsbegriff und seine Stellung in der deutschen Staatslehre”). Instead of simply regarding Zhang’s writing as plagiarism, my paper interrogates the gaps between Carl Schmitt’s original text and Zhang’s translation. By examining the intertextual relation between Carl Schmitt and Zhang Junmai, this paper reveals a latent aspect of the spectrum of Constitutionalism in the twentieth century and shows a special dialogue between a German critic of constitutionalism and a Chinese constitutionalist.

Keywords: internal politics, external politics, concept of the political, Rechtsstaat, neutral state



2. Concretising the Legal Professional Community in Late Imperial China, c. 1700–1900

Li Chen

Abstract: This article examines the empire-wide legal professional community that emerged for the first time in Chinese history during the Qing period (1644–1911). By analyzing a wide range of archival records and primary sources, this study provides valuable insights into the dynamic configurations of late imperial China’s legal culture and juridical field, as well as the thousands of legal specialists who shaped them. The findings challenge much of the received wisdom about late imperial China, which has too often been assumed as a Confucian society that discouraged the use of law and legal expertise and was therefore unlikely to have witnessed so many Confucian literati becoming legal specialists, both within and outside the judicial system.

Keywords: Qing law, legal culture, juridical field, legal professionals, Chinese legal tradition


3. Interrogating the Drunkards and Representing Drunkenness in the Qing Law

Jackson Yue Bin Guo

Abstract: The consumption of shaojiu or distilled liquor played a significant role in Qing legal culture and contributed to a rise in alcohol-related crimes. Qing officials’ attitudes towards intoxication not only influenced their judgments on many cases, but also reflected important trends of popular beliefs, notions, and practices that constituted shared knowledge and feelings between ordinary people and judges. This paper examines the transformation of Qing judicial practices and concerns regarding alcohol intoxication and crimes, arguing that specific cultural value and ideas that underpinned the public configuration of drinking behaviour during the Qing period contributed to a social pathology around intoxication. Due to the lack of a consistent interpretation of the effects of alcohol on the mind, early Qing officials tended to be lenient towards intoxicated offenders. However, mid-Qing law-makers and rulers recognized the serious administrative concerns associated with heavy drinking and began to conceptualize it as a serious social problem.

Keywords: intoxication; mens rea; alcohol; judicial practice; Qing Dynasty


4. The Sale of Offices, Corruption, and Formalization: A Comparative Study of China and France in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries

Xinyu Huang

AbstractThis paper provides a detailed exploration of the sale of offices in China and France in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In France, the sale of offices became deeply integrated into the officialdom, effectively serving as a formal institution. It was a part of the financial framework and contributed to the operation of the bureaucracy. However, this practice led to public dissatisfaction due to concerns about the fairness of the judicial system. Conversely, in China, the sale of offices was less formalized and more directly associated with corruption due to the close connection with informal income and the challenge to the formal system of imperial civil examinations. It was considered an ad hoc, informal, and pragmatic solution to financial emergencies. The sale of offices, in a different context, was seen as having both positive and negative aspects, with its impact varying, depending on the specific function it served.

Keywords: sale of offices, corruption, formalization, China, France


5. Adultery Law and State Power in Early Empires: China and Rome Compared

Yunxin Li

AbstractAs ancient China and Rome transformed into empires, both states showed an increasing interest in regulating family ethics and individuals` sexuality. Using excavated documents and transmitted texts, this article compares legal statutes and practices against illicit consensual sex in early imperial China (221 BCE–220 CE) with those in the Roman empire. On the one hand, both legal systems aimed at consolidating social hierarchies based on gender, status, and generation. On the other, the Roman and Chinese statutes had different emphases due to their respective political, social, and cultural contexts, and the actual penalties for adultery and incest differed significantly from those prescribed in the statutes. In both empires, control over individuals` sexuality facilitated state power`s penetration into the family during empire-building, giving rise to laws in areas that had been largely left to customs and individual will.

Keywords: early China, Rome, law, adultery, incest, sexuality


6. Obligation, Informed Consent, and Health-Care Reforms in China

Jia Liu

Abstract: Drawing on recent jurisprudential literature that emphasizes the role and function performed by obligation, this article examines how the ethical doctrine of informed consent has been implemented in the context of health-care reforms in China. It argues that, while the Chinese incorporation of informed consent has sought to empower patients, the major medical laws and social policies fail to instantiate the obligations. Along with this failure, the Chinese medical laws have also failed to secure the bond of trust between them. This article also points out that a rounded analysis of the implementation of informed consent in China must take into account the obligation and function of the major components of the health-care delivery system other than physicians and hospitals, such as health-care insurance schemes.

Keywords: obligation, informed consent, medical law, health-care reform, China


7. Re-cloistered Feminine Space: Chinese Women’s Prison in Shanghai, 1888–1912

Chaoran Ma

AbstractThis article examines China’s first women’s prison in the context of diplomatic disputes, legal reforms, and gender order at the turn of the twentieth century. It shows that the custody of female offenders in the Shanghai International Settlement became a battleground in which the interests and perceptions of late imperial China and the Western authorities clashed. Under pressure from the Western authorities, the first Chinese women’s prison was established in 1907, even prior to the formal introduction of custodial sentences into China’s criminal code. Notably, the Chinese officials did not embrace prison as a more benevolent punitive institution; rather, they saw it more as a tool to consolidate its judicial sovereignty and preserve gender norms. For Chinese women, the prison, functioning as a re-cloistered feminine space, further entrenched the confinement of their bodies, thereby perpetuating rather than changing orthodox values of female chastity. This article questions the universal modernity of European penalties by pointing out that the introduction of imprisonment as a supposedly more civilized and humane form of punishment may have placed Chinese women at a greater disadvantage.

Keywords: women’s prison, diplomatic dispute, legal reform, gender order, modern China


8. Ideological and Cultural Policy as Speech Policy: An Overlooked Aspect of Free Speech in China (1940s–2000s)

Yilu Zuo

Abstract: Free speech scholars have been preoccupied with laws, regulations, judicial opinions, and other traditional “legal” materials. However, this article examines an often-overlooked object in at least studying China’s speech rights—the ideological and cultural policy of the party-state. The party-state’s ideological and cultural policy has not only, for better or worse, profoundly shaped speech rights in China; and more significantly and paradoxically, it also contains the seed that might promote China’s speech rights in the future. The party-state has had a long and deep-rooted tradition of promoting a democratic culture; by tracing the development of this tradition from the 1940s to the 2000s, this article argues that it may provide a new context and angle for thinking about people’s right to cultural construction and perhaps free speech in general in China.

Keywords: free speech, ideological and cultural policy, speech policy, Chinese Constitution, cultural construction


The Japanese Imperial Monarchy as an Icon of Sociopolitical Signification - Japan’s Imperial House in the Postwar Era, 1945−2019.

By Kenneth J. Ruoff. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2020, 419 pp. Hardcover $32.00

Kenneth J. Ruoff


Prostitution as the Critical Gendered Paradox across Law, Society, and the State - The Regulation of Prostitution in China: Law in the Everyday Lives of Sex Workers, Police Officers, and Public Health Officials.

By Margaret Boittin. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2024. 444pp. Hardcover: $135.00

Margaret Boittin


Positionality in International Socio-Legal Scholarship - Out of Place: Fieldwork and Positionality in Law and Society.

By Lynette J. Chua and Mark Fathi Massoud. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2024. 213pp. Hardcover: $97.00

Lynette J. Chua and Mark Fathi Massoud


https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/asian-journal-of-law-and-society/article/foreword/8D5442037964FAB606ED261057193E26

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/asian-journal-of-law-and-society/latest-issue

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/asian-journal-of-law-and-society